Nowhere to Run

I talk about my New Website http://dvdtract.com and about a new video I did about 2012 called the Institute for Human Continuity. I also rant about vearious apologetics topocs and the like. Show Notes:

I talk with Russ Dizdar from Shatter The Darkness about his recent projects concerning Evangelism. We also get updated on Shatter The Darkness and his new book The Black Awakening. Show Notes: Russ' email shatterxmail@sbcglobal.net http://shatterthedarkness.net

Chris plays audio from four of his new videos. and talks a little about each.

This is an Interview with Andre from Outlaw Journalism, Andre recently wrote an article which strongly suggest that Alan Watt's books and a great majority of his information came from a man named Glen Kealey. Alan says he only talked to Kealey 'once in the nineties' and Kealey says Alan called him for "weeks on end" to "pick his brain" and that Watt copied his material, "never gave him credit for being the originator of all the ideas" but Kealey said he wasn't in it for the money anyway. Watt then accused Andre and his forum of death threats and made some bizarre threats himself about the cops watching the outlaw forum now and other things. This interview was to set the record straight and to deny accusations of death threats Andre's article http://www.outlawjournalism.com/?p=85 Kealey's response http://www.conspiracyclothes.com/nowheretorun/mp3/glen%20kealey%20clip.mp3 EDIT: A day after this interview all of Kealeys websites were removed from their servers. Alan Watt Threats, Lies and Plagiarism

Chris talks about 2012, and more reasons its such a crucial part of a planned deception. Also discussed is the situation in Israel as well as a debunking of the Khazar theory from Arthur Koestler, and how it essentially is tricking well meaning Christians to be anti-semetic. Chris plays a clip from Ravi Zacharias and picks on fox news a lot. Show notes: my collection of recent fox news font page stories that are trying to get people mad at israel http://conspiracyclothes.com/foxnazi.html

Chris and Frank interview David W. Lowe about bible prophecy and the state of the world. www.earthquakeresurrection.com

Chris Talks about The Revelations Radio Network..and a few of his new projects.

Chris talks rants about various issues loosley based on change. note: this is not Obama (change) related

A short show. A few announcements and talking about the videos Ive made this week.

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=2846284361709250986 http://www.geraldschroeder.com/age.html Today, we look at time going backward. We see 15 billion years. Looking forward from when the universe is very small - billions of times smaller - the Torah says six days. In truth, they both may be correct. What's exciting about the last few years in cosmology is we now have quantified the data to know the relationship of the "view of time" from the beginning, relative to the "view of time" today. It's not science fiction any longer. Any one of a dozen physics text books all bring the same number. The general relationship between time near the beginning and time today is a million million. That's a 1 with 12 zeros after it. So when a view from the beginning looking forward says "I'm sending you a pulse every second," would we see it every second? No. We'd see it every million million seconds. Because that's the stretching effect of the expansion of the universe. The Torah doesn't say every second, does it? It says Six Days. How would we see those six days? If the Torah says we're sending information for six days, would we receive that information as six days? No. We would receive that information as six million million days. Because the Torah's perspective is from the beginning looking forward. Six million million days is a very interesting number. What would that be in years? Divide by 365 and it comes out to be 16 billion years. Essentially the estimate of the age of the universe. Not a bad guess for 3000 years ago. The way these two figures match up is extraordinary. I'm not speaking as a theologian; I'm making a scientific claim. I didn't pull these numbers out of hat. That's why I led up to the explanation very slowly, so you can follow it step-by-step. Now we can go one step further. Let's look at the development of time, day-by-day, based on the expansion factor. Every time the universe doubles, the perception of time is cut in half. Now when the universe was small, it was doubling very rapidly. But as the universe gets bigger, the doubling time gets exponentially longer. This rate of expansion is quoted in "The Principles of Physical Cosmology," a textbook that is used literally around the world. (In case you want to know, this exponential rate of expansion has a specific number averaged at 10 to the 12th power. That is in fact the temperature of quark confinement, when matter freezes out of the energy: 10.9 times 10 to the 12th power Kelvin degrees divided by (or the ratio to) the temperature of the universe today, 2.73 degrees. That's the initial ratio which changes exponentially as the universe expands.) The calculations come out to be as follows: * The first of the Biblical days lasted 24 hours, viewed from the "beginning of time perspective." But the duration from our perspective was 8 billion years. * The second day, from the Bible's perspective lasted 24 hours. From our perspective it lasted half of the previous day, 4 billion years. * The third day also lasted half of the previous day, 2 billion years. * The fourth day - one billion years. * The fifth day - one-half billion years. * The sixth day - one-quarter billion years. When you add up the Six Days, you get the age of the universe at 15 and 3/4 billion years. The same as modern cosmology. Is it by chance? But there's more. The Bible goes out on a limb and tells you what happened on each of those days. Now you can take cosmology, paleontology, archaeology, and look at the history of the world, and see whether or not they match up day-by-day. And I'll give you a hint. They match up close enough to send chills up your spine.

Documentary discussing the research and claims of so-called 'Godfather of Secret Societies' Jordan Maxwell aka Russell Pine from Truthout media http://youtube.com/truthoutmedia

Just a few thoughts on a particular issue.

Whats the deal with Cydonia? Chris revises his previous theory about it and proposes a new one. A lot happening in this episode dont miss it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fv8f6KclIs Show Notes: http://standeyo.com/stans.files/Face_of_Mars.pdf Richard Hoagland and religion http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2030707978100913713 David Flynns Presentations http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1809393878728948984 and http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2018284938536095474 Council of Nine connection to the face http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_council9_01.htm Chuck Missler commentary http://www.firefighters.org/html/author.cfm?Book_ID=1&Author_ID=74

2012 theories are a lot like snowflakes. No two are alike. There are a multitude of reasons as to why there is so much disagreement amongst theorists and researchers regarding events purportedly to happen in 2012, and more specifically, why they believe these events are going to happen. Let us first examine what may likely be the most common 2012 theory, which claims that on December 21, 2012 there will be some form of mystical astronomical alignment with the center of our galaxy. There are two main versions of this part of the theory, the first of which states that the alignment occur when the sun rises above the horizon on December 21st 2012 (the winter solstice) at which point the sun will rise in the middle of the milky way, thus causing an alignment between the earth sun and the galactic center This does appear accurate and can be verified this with an astronomy program. However, there are at least two problems with this concept, the first of which is that this event is only significant from the earth’s point of view. The precession cycle or the 26,000 year wobble of the earth only causes the EFFECT of the stars changing position on the horizon. The visual effect only occurs from the earth’s perspective, so that if you were viewing this “precession” from anywhere else in the solar system it would be completely insignificant and uneventful. There is no gravitational force or radiation to be expected from this event because other than the tilt of the earth, nothing will be any different than the last few thousand solstices and as such, the Earth will be no closer to the galactic center than any other day. If the Mayans did in fact point to this event with their calendar (which we will look into later) it should be noted how the overall event is harmless and seemingly insignificant beyond its role in time keeping and/or for religious purposes. But there is no reason to believe it will be an event of a magnitude so great that there will be a pole shift or any other cataclysms, as in reality it is a visual illusion and not an “Earth changing” event of any true physical power. Another issue with the December 21, 2012 date is that because the precession is so slow there is almost no difference between say, December 21, 2008 and , and December 21, 2012. This is because technically, the sun will "rise in galactic center" for this year’s winter solstice, just as it will in 2012. In fact here is a quote from John Major Jenkins one of the major proponents of the 2012 theories from a part of his website called "Response to Counter arguments " he says: “In the interest of clarity, I will mention that it would be more accurate to say that the alignment occurs in the ERA of A.D. 2012; because precession is such a slow phenomenon, fifty years on either side of 2012 might be appropriate.” by John Major Jenkins The second camp of belief surrounding the 2012 alignment issue is probably the more significant of the two because it is dealing with the solar system’s actual location in relation to galactic center. This is the idea that our little solar system is moving around the center of the galaxy every 225 years or so million years or so, and while doing so it is moving up and down in a cycle crossing the plane every 33 million years. So are we going to cross that galactic plane in 2012? Absolutely not! According to the journal Nature, as well as many others, there is evidence of crossing this plane 3 million years ago. This would mean that we are moving away from the galactic plane and won’t be due to cross it for another 30 million years and that’s failing to mention that the margin of error in these calculations in at least 2.1 parsecs or about 6.5 light years making images like these and statements like this: completely meaningless. What about a Pole Shift? Although many theorists disagree on whether this pole shift will be magnetic or a physical shifting of the crust of the ea(continued)

"In this episode, we introduce you to the NEW TLF show and also interview Chris White of No Where to Run about the movie Zeitgeist which he has taken an open position of opposition to" Show Notes: http://truthlovefreedom.org/ http://revereradio.net