Summary: <p>Step into the latest episode of the podcast as co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow are once again joined by Oxford University Crankstart student Suzi Darrington. They unpack the intricacies of sustainable practices and distribution in the context of a fascinating listener question from Trevor at Wood Farm, Oxford, England. Trevor’s question is:</p> <p>“I see a company has popped up in The Cotswolds that recycles fishermen's nets etc. Would it be more sustainable if this popped up on the coast somewhere?”</p> <p>Stuart kickstarts the debate by spotlighting the complex web of sustainability. He highlights how the carbon footprint is associated with transporting products inland, and challenges the notion of solely focusing on the company's location.</p> <p>William chimes in, expanding on Stuart's observation, suggesting that for sustainability to thrive, these recycling facilities would need to be present in every coastal port. He introduces the concept of carbon-neutral distribution and explores how controlling the movement of goods could revolutionise sustainability efforts.</p> <p>Suzi lends her voice to the discourse, advocating a balanced view of sustainability. She praises the positive impact of any recycling initiative and highlights the significant volume of waste that isn't currently being recycled.</p> <p>Stuart turns his attention to the mathematical side of sustainability, suggesting that as time passes, if this can’t be done at every fishing port, an inland location might lead to reduced transportation emissions due to its equidistant centralised nature.</p> <p>William Mankelow draws parallels between sustainable distribution in this context and the carbon emissions associated with the last leg of supermarket shopping.</p> <p>Suzi urges listeners not to overstate transportation's carbon impact in the grand scheme of things. She highlights that while transportation does play a role, other industries have far more damaging consequences. </p> <p>William raises that this company should be applauded for existing in the first place, which on the whole Suzi and Stuart agree with. </p> <p>What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to <a href="mailto:thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com">thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com</a></p> <p>We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.</p> <p>This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. <br>Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends<a href="https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view"> https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view</a> , support our work through Patreon<a href="https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside"> https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside</a> or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link:<a href="https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside"> https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside</a></p> --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message
