Summary: <p>The Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, and ending the constitutional right to abortion, could have meaningful repercussions on assisted reproductive technology, including in vitro fertilization, also known as IVF. IVF is one of the most widely known forms of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Assisted reproduction plays a role in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html">2 percent of all births</a> in the United States.</p> <p>Some fertility experts worry that the existing language in state laws could complicate or even limit the choices of would-be parents.</p> <p>Guests:<a href="https://www.bostonivf.com/our-practice/physicians/KimThornton/">Dr. Kim Thornton</a>, Director of the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology at <a href="https://twitter.com/BIDMChealth">Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center</a> in Boston and a reproductive endocrinologist at <a href="https://twitter.com/BostonIVF">Boston IVF</a>. Dr. Thornton, thanks for being with us. <a href="https://twitter.com/louise_p_king">Dr. Louise King</a>, an ethicist and surgeon who serves as Director of Reproductive Bioethics at the Harvard Medical School’s Center for Bioethics, and Vice Chair of the Ethics Committee of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.</p>
