Implications in Cause and Manner Rulings - Coroner Talk™ | Death Investigation Training | Police and Law Enforcement

Summary: <a href="http://coronertalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bilde2-248x300.jpg"></a>Even if we do the best investigation possible, there will often be disagreement in our cause and manner rulings.  This could  apply to any manner of death; suicide, accident, even in a ruling of natural death. The article below from Detroit Free Press is a great example of the implications that can arise from a ruling.<br> <br>  <br> The family of a deceased Detroit man is upset over the medical examiner’s ruling that the man’s death was a suicide. The family argues that he never intended to take his own life but rather was the victim of a lesson in safety gone terribly wrong.<br> The victim’s family says that 39-year-old James Jewell, although he had prior felony convictions, had turned his life around and was now happy and at a positive place. They are now demanding that the manner of death be changed from suicide to accident, according to a report by the Detroit Free Press.<br> Jewell was standing just an arm’s length away from his girlfriend of nearly four years, Jennifer Jackson, when he put a .22-caliber handgun to his head and pulled the trigger. However, Jackson claims that it was never his intent to take his own life.<br> “I was there. I know that’s not what he wanted to do,” Jackson said.<br> Nonetheless, the Oakland County Medical Examiner Ljubisa Dragovic stands behind his office’s ruling. “In forensic pathology, intent is not something that is measurable or evaluable,” he said.<br> Dragovic also clarified that suicide is classified as a manner of death that results from a purposeful act of one’s self, and that the evidence, which included an imprint of the muzzle on Jewell’s temple, all point to a purposeful act.<br> “The victim pulled the trigger and pointed the gun and applied the gun to his temple, unfortunately, and pulled the trigger, which all constitutes a set series of purposeful acts,” Dragovic explained.<br> Jewell’s fateful day in February had started with the couple eating breakfast at a small diner. They discussed plans for their future, which included them wanting to travel the country in an RV.<br> Later that afternoon, the couple, along with Jackson’s father, relaxed while enjoying beers, shots, lunch and a few games of pool at a local bar. After the fun-filled afternoon, Jackson dropped Jewell off at their newly purchased home while she went to pick up her three children.<br> When she returned home, Jewell had three handguns sitting on the bed in their room. Jewell had been working late at night and wanted Jackson to keep a gun in the bedroom for protection. Yet although Jackson was a U.S. Army veteran, she readily admitted that she never felt comfortable around firearms.<br> “I don’t like just the uncertainty of whether or not it’s going to go off,” she explained.<br> That night, while Jackson’s children were in the other room, Jewell attempted to show her just how safe firearms actually are, and explained to her that “you can do all these hundreds of little actions, and nothing would happen.”<br> “He said, ‘Look, I’ll show you one more time,’” Jackson recalled. “That’s when he put it to his head, and it went off.”<br> She believes that although he knew the magazine was fully loaded, he did not think there was a bullet in the chamber.<br> Jackson, Jewell’s family, and even the Oakland County Sheriff’s disagree with the medical examiner’s ruling that the act was a suicide. In fact, investigators didn’t find a shred of evidence to indicate that Jewell actually meant to kill himself.<br> “There was nothing indicative of an attempt to commit suicide,” said Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard. “It was as was reported, (that) he was showing reported safety of the weapons, but, tragically, using a very, very unsafe process.”<br> However, authorities do believe that alcohol may have played a part in Jewell’s decision to pull the trigger of a loaded handgun while holding it ...