The Gary Null Show
Summary: Gary takes on the real issues that the mainstream media is afraid to tackle. Tune in to find out the latest about health news, healing, politics, and the economy.
The Gary Null Show is here to inform you on the best news in health, healing, the environment.
Wikipedia Astroturfing to Discredit Energy Medicine and Psychology Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD Progressive Radio Network, November 26, 2019 In 2014, a heated exchange took place between Wikipedia's co-founder Jimmy Wales and the Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology's President Dr. Debby Vajda. The internet war of words was the first instance revealing Wales' prejudiced disdain for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) and a clear indication that he firmly embraces modern Skepticism's dogma and culture to destroy CAM therapies. Due to the misleading and incorrect information on Wikipedia's page for Energy Psychology, Dr. Vajda posted a petition on Change.org to put out a call for people to boycott giving donations to the encyclopedia. The petition stated: "Wikipedia is widely used and trusted. Unfortunately, much of the information related to holistic approaches to healing is biased, misleading, out-of-date, or just plain wrong. For five years, repeated efforts to correct this misinformation have been blocked and the Wikipedia organization has not addressed these issues. As a result, people who are interested in the benefits of Energy Medicine, Energy Psychology, and specific approaches such as the Emotional Freedom Techniques, Thought Field Therapy and the Tapas Acupressure Technique, turn to your pages, trust what they read, and do not pursue getting help from these approaches." Vajda is simply restating a common complaint every professional association of a CAM discipline has voiced against Wikipedia. That is, we believe Wikipedia makes intentional efforts to dissuade the public from turning to CAM treatments to remedy their illnesses and disease. The only alternative Wikipedia offers patients, therefore, is conventional, pharmaceutical-based medicine. In effect, Wales and his WikiMedia Foundation are intentionally or unintentionally astroturfing on behalf of pharmaceutical economic interests. And the Foundation is by no means free from being financially entangled with drug makers. Over the years it has received donations from Amgen, Astex Pharma, Biogen, Bristol Myer, Merck, Pfizer and United Health. It has also received several million dollars from Alphabet (the parent company of Google), which is now a formal private pharmaceutical company partnering with Glaxo, Merck and Novartis. Vajda also singles out the Skeptics who have co-opted Wikpedia's pages and with intentional malice skew and reject the scientific data showing the efficacy and safety of these alternative medical modalities: "Wikipedia pages for Energy Psychology, Energy Medicine, acupuncture and other forms of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM), [...] are currently skewed to a negative, unscientific view of these approaches despite numerous rigorous studies in recent years demonstrating their effectiveness. These pages are controlled by a few self-appointed “skeptics” who serve as de facto censors for Wikipedia. They clothe their objections in the language of the narrowest possible understanding of science in order to inhibit open discussion of innovation in health care. As gatekeepers for the status quo, they refuse discourse with leading edge research scientists and clinicians or, for that matter, anyone with a different point of view. Fair-minded referees should be given the responsibility of monitoring these important areas." Wales angrily responded that "What we won't do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of true scientific discourse. It isn't." In response Vajda provided 51 peer-reviewed articles and studies, 18 which were randomized controlled, appearing in professional journals, including the American Psychological Association, the Journal of Clinical Psychology, the Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice and others showing positive statistical results outside the range of chance. In fact the volume of published scientific literature she could have provided is vastly larger. Endorsements by major conventional medical associations, such as the American Psychological Association, the Association of Social Work Boards, the National Board of Certified Counselors, and the National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors were also cited to confirm Energy Psychology's acceptance and efficacy in mainstream medicine. Nevertheless every attempt made to correct the Skeptics' litany of misinformation and questionable citations were rejected. Wales' discriminatory labeling of CAM practitioners as "lunatic charlatans" has been taken up by Wikipedia's Skeptic editors as a mantra to validate their hidden agendas. Frequently on editorial Talk pages, Skeptics quote Wales' words to convince their critics that he supports their cause. The term also gives Skeptics license to defame CAM supporters as quacks and a separate Wikipedia page for "Lunatic Charlatans" was created on the encyclopedia. The page states in no uncertain terms Wikipedia's policy to discredit CAM and continue to identify it as pseudoscience: "This unapologetic endorsement of the NPOV [neutral point of view] policy on pseudoscience and the policy on fringe science is the clearest indication yet that Wikipedia's robust response to cranks, quacks and charlatans is solidly in line with Wikipedia's foundational goals." During a TEDx lecture, former CBS program host Sharyl Attkinsson described Wikipedia as "astroturf's dream come true." It is no secret that pharmaceutical companies will hire public relations firms to recruit writers and publicists to infiltrate Wikipedia pages and edit positive messages about their drugs and products. They also join Talk groups to influence editorial discussions in favor of removing criticisms, regardless of how much scientific literature to the contrary. By definition, astroturfing is the practice of concealing the financial sources behind public messages in order to give the impression that reporting originates from unbiased and objective grassroots sources. However, astroturfing does not necessarily require manipulation of messaging for economic advantage as a fundamental motivation. It can also be ideological, for example, the psychological astroturfing waged by Skeptics, such as Susan Gerbic's and Tim Farley's Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia, to promulgate what we interpret as blatant misinformation and even defamatory content to portray its opponents negatively. Wikipedia's Energy Psychology page is a clear example of Skeptics' ideological astroturfing. Skeptics rely heavily upon the data provided by the astroturf organization Quackwatch. Since 1980, Quackwatch's founder Stephen Barrett has served on the scientific advisory board of the American Council on Science and Health, a corporate front group that has been heavily criticized by the FDA and Public Citizen for providing false propaganda on products known to endanger human health and the environment, including tobacco, pesticides, BPA, genetically modified crops, junk food and high corn syrup soft drinks. Stephen Novella, founder of the Skeptic blog Science Based Medicine, likewise serves on the Council's advisory board. Quackwatch and the Science Based Medicine blog technically function as forums for ideological astroturfing. In the case of the former, there have been charges of financial and institutional conflicts of interest as well. Throughout many of their essays criticizing alternative medicine, Quackwatch and Science Based Medicine Skeptics take many of the Council's main talking points. In some cases, particularly when accusing alternative practices as financial scams, Quackwatch and the Council are indistinguishable. On the Wikipedia page for Energy Medicine, the visitor is told, "Energy medicine, energy therapy, energy healing, vibrational medicine, psychic healing, spiritual medicine or spiritual healing are branches of alternative medicine based on a pseudo-scientific belief that healers can channel healing energy into a patient and effect positive results. This idea itself contains several methods: hands-on, hands-off, and distant (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations... While early reviews of the scientific literature on energy healing were equivocal and recommended further research, more recent reviews have concluded that there is no evidence supporting clinical efficiency. The theoretical basis of healing has been criticized as implausible, research and reviews supportive of energy medicine have been faulted for containing methodological flaws and selection bias and positive therapeutic results have been determined to result from known psychological mechanisms." However the actual peer-reviewed challenge this assumption. Rich Umbdenstock, the President of the American Hospital Association, has stated, "Complementary and alternative medicine has shown great promise in supporting and stimulated healing. It's one of the many tools hospitals look to as they continue to create optimal healing environments for the patients they serve." And according to the Center for Reiki Research, one of the major treatment modalities under Energy Medicine, the Center collaborates with 65 major American hospitals including prestigious ones such Duke University, Columbia and Yale, and Children's Hospital Boston. The article further argues that the fundamental, underlying principle of Energy Medicine and Psychology, the biofield, is bogus. "Physicists and sceptics criticize these explanations as pseudophysics," the page's editors state, "a branch of pseudoscience which explains magical thinking by using irrelevant jargon from modern physics to exploit scientific illiteracy and to impress the unsophisticated." It is noteworthy that the page identifies "sceptics" as a voice of authority whereas Skepticism remains a fringe movement not accepted by the consensus of the scientific community. If this were not the case, then we believe numerous highly respected scientists and medical experts would hold membership in their organizations. However, this is far from the case. Skepticism represents only a tiny fraction of the scientific medical community. To support its position, the Wikipedia page cites Quackwatch, the Science Based Medicine blog, and Edzard Ernst, an influential Skeptic associated with Skepticism's flagship organization the Center for Inquiry. Under the Wikipedia heading "Emotional Freedom Techniques" (EFT), a therapeutic system widely used by practitioners of Energy Medicine and Psychology, Skeptic editors write in the introductory paragraphs: "The Skeptical Inquirer describes the foundations of EFT as "a hodgepodge of concepts derived from a variety of sources, [primarily] the ancient Chinese philosophy of chi, which is thought to be the 'life force' that flows throughout the body." The existence of this life force is not empirically supported... EFT has no benefit as a therapy beyond the placebo effect or any known-effective psychological techniques that may be provided in addition to the purported "energy" technique. It is generally characterized as pseudoscience and it has not garnered significant support in clinical psychology." Again, the scientific literature suggests otherwise. For example: Rubik B et al. "Manual healing methods" Alternative Medicine: a report to the National Institutes of Health on alternative medicine systems and practices in the United States. NIH Publications: US Government Printing Office, 1995: 113-57 Rosch PJ. "Bioelectromagnetic and subtle energy medicine." Annals New York Academy of Science. 1177: 297-311 (2009) Gronowicz, G. A., Jhaveri, A., Clarke, L. W., Aronow, M. S., & Smith, T. H. (2008). Therapeutic touch stimulates the proliferation of human cells in culture. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 14(3), 233-239. Hammerschlag, R., Marx, B., Yamamoto, M., & Aickin, M. (2012). Non-touch biofield therapy: a systematic review of human randomized controlled trials reporting use of only non-physical contact treatment P02.42. BMC Complement Altern Med., 12((Suppl 1)), P98 Honda, N., Ohgi, S., Wada, N., Loo, K. K., Higashimoto, Y., & Fukuda, K. (2013). Effect of therapeutic touch on brain activation of preterm infants in response to sensory punctate stimulus: a near-infrared spectroscopy-based study. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition, 98(3), F244-248. Jain, S., McMahon, G. F., Hasen, P., Kozub, M. P., Porter, V., King, R., & Guarneri, E. M. (2012). Healing Touch with Guided Imagery for PTSD in returning active duty military: a randomized controlled trial. Military Medicine, 177(9), 1015-1021. The Skeptical Inquirer is a heavily biased ideological publication that we cannot find evidence for being acknowledged by the mainstream media nor the professional scientific community as a source for objective and reliable review of alternative medicine. Attkinsson outlines several clues for identifying astroturf activities on Wikipedia's health-related pages: Frequent use of highly charged and inflammatory language such as quack, crank and conspiracy theorist to denigrate those personalities the editors hate; Avoidance of scientific facts and relying solely upon editorial commentaries to wash away any constructive and positive information about a person; A tendency to attack those who question authority, the consensus of the dominant paradigm rather than to question an authoritative position itself. Each of these characteristics are prevalent among the Skeptic editors on Wikipedia and are most pronounced on the encyclopedia's "Talk" pages. Skeptics conduct themselves in a fashion in direct violation of Wikipedia's own rules for maintaining a "neutral point of view" (NPOV) which "require a fair representation of all significant viewpoints regarding a subject." Both corporate and ideological astroturfing also prevail across Facebook and Google's search results that optimize pharmaceutical products' positive reviews. The Wikimedia Foundation and Wales have been fully aware of the culture of astroturfing that infects much of the encyclopedia's content. Given the very nature of Wikipedia's chaotic strategy to create an authentic encyclopedia by allowing anonymous writers and editors to create its content, astroturfing is inevitable. As the world's fifth most popular website, everyone who has a private agenda to push upon the public is welcome to participate. This is only further evidence that we believe Wikipedia should be a source of last resort for accessing any reliable information about non-conventional medical practices that are used by the majority of the world's population. In conclusion, we ask the members of the scientific and medical communities and in particular the media to do their due diligence before they rush to judgment to censure CAM therapies. We have done our homework. And we have identified thousands of peer-reviewed studies supporting the very therapies Wikipedia condemns, mocks and ridicules as pseudosicence or of no value. If Wikipedia Skeptics were criticizing only one or several modalities within CAM's enormous field of various medical and health systems, it would be reasonable. Rather they condemn CAM in its entirety despite its long-standing scientific confirmation and history of success. Skeptics also deny the virtue of the most important and relevant part of the healing process: the relationship between the physician and patient in the clinical experience. Daily every medical doctor from surgeons to psychiatrists, from oncologists to pediatricians, from cardiologists to OGYN physicians ask their patients "how do you feel" in order to gain additional insights for continuing or to redirect the treatment. Therefore, we must consider the likelihood that the large majority of board-certified physicians and clinicians who have adopted CAM therapies began by relying solely upon the orthodox medical protocols they were educated in. At some point during their careers, they discovered these protocols' limitations and perhaps life-threatening risks. As a result, they searched outside the conventional paradigm for alternative and safer solutions to treat their patients. Today there is a growing number of doctors and patients using CAM because it works. What then does this say about the close-mindedness and rigid ideological beliefs of Wikipedia Skeptics who have neither the clinical experience as clinicians or as medical researchers? Nevertheless the height Skeptics' hubris would deny the positive results millions of patients have received from CAM practitioners. We regard this the culture of cognitive dissonance as a fundamental characteristic of modern day Skepticism.
The Gary Null Show is here to inform you on the best news in health, healing, the environment. Today's Article: Bills that would mandate the HPV vaccine in New York schools up for votes Today's Videos: Dr. Suzanne Humphries on Gardasil Because it's not a drill: talk by Jem Bendell at European Commission
Gary Null Wants YOUR Help Short Summary Dr. Gary Null was formerly a Research Fellow at the Institute for Applied Biology for 33 years. He has conducted many dozens of experiments and clinical trials addressing the impact of lifestyle, behavior and nutrition on disease and aging processes. He is also an award-winning documentary film director, which includes How to Live Forever, Age is Only a Number and Power Aging. What We Need & What You Get We will be interviewing and filming some of North America's leading medical authorities on anti-aging. These physicians and researchers will be presented with the results of our clinical trial and provide biological contexts for their success. Donations will help us reach these people sand professionally record and film their knowledge. The scientific analysis of the clinical trial, direction, production, editing and filming will cost approximately $100,000. This includes filming the participants in the clinical trial and up to 20 anti-aging specialists. The documentary will be streamed for free over the internet. The Impact This clinical trial is unique and to our knowledge has never been conducted thus far. Preliminary results from the trial have been extraordinary. All the health protocols used during the trial can easily be adopted by people in their homes. Other Ways You Can Help During Dr. Null's 45-year career in the health field, he has counseled and worked with tens of thousands of individuals. His focus has been on extending the quality of people's lives and reversing disease. Throughout these many years, Dr. Null has always provided health counseling without any monetary remuneration. He has also hosted the nation's longest daily radio program on medicine and health for over 45 years. This study which be available to general public for free. Spread the word and share with as many people as possible.
The Gary Null Show is here to inform you on the best news in health, healing, the environment. Slowing down -- Is aging caused by decreased cellular metabolism? Legumes boost heart health, according to new review study, Inflammatory processes drive progression of Alzheimer's and other brain diseases, Is garlic the key to improving cognitive health among the elderly?,
The double standard in the Congressional Ukraine investigations to impeach Trump Stephen Lendman is an independent , progressive economist, historian and investigative writer who consistently tackles the most critical issues in the world as soon as they emerge. He holds degrees from Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business and has worked as a marketing research analyst for several large US corporations before focusing his attention on geopolitical research on finance, war and peace issues, social equity and international humanitarian crises. Stephen is the recipient of the International Journalist award from the prestigious Club of Mexico and a Project Censored award. He is the author of the book “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks World War III,” a collection of 22 essays providing an alternative perspective to the fraudulent major media and government narrative of events in the Ukraine. Stephen's articles appear almost daily on Global Research and his website is StephenLendman.org
How to Save the Planet and Ourselves Chris Hedges If you read only one book this year, it should be Roger Hallam’s “Common Sense for the 21st Century: Only Nonviolent Rebellion Can Now Stop Climate Breakdown and Social Collapse.” Hallam’s lucid and concise book, which echoes Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense,” says what many of us now know to be true but do not say: If we do not replace the ruling elites soon we are finished as a species. It is a cogent, well-argued case for global rebellion—the only form of resistance that can save us from ecosystem collapse and human-induced genocide. It correctly analyzes the failure of environmentalist activists in groups such as 350.org to understand and confront global corporate power and thus make a meaningful impact as we barrel toward ecocide. “Common Sense for the 21st Century” is a survival manual for the human species. “The corrupt system is going to kill us all unless we rise up,” Hallam, a co-founder of Extinction Rebellion, bluntly warns. The activism, protests, lobbying, petitions, appeals to the United Nations and misguided trust in “liberal” politicians such as Barack Obama and Al Gore, along with the work of countless NGOs, have been accompanied by a 60% rise in global carbon dioxide emissions since 1990. The United Nations estimates this will be augmented by a 40% rise in CO2 emissions in the next 10 years. Hallam, who has long been a part of the environmental movement, says of his past activism: “I was wasting my time.” Read More
Quackwatch’s Hatred of Acupuncture. Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD Progressive Radio Network, November 18, 2019 The author of the Quackwatch entry for Acupuncture entitled “Be Wary of Acupuncture, Qigong and Chinese Medicine” is Quackwatch founder Stephen Barrett. It represents Quackwatch’s official position on acupuncture that has served the purposes of Skeptic organizations, including Skeptic editors on Wikipedia, for falsely discrediting this ancient Chinese medical practice. Barrett is sometimes careful to personally call medical practices that have a large following as pseudoscientific. Rather he is fond of referencing others who are more adversely critical. He quotes Harriet Hall (a sitting member of the Quackwatch board of science advisers and one of the four editors of the Quackwatch-related Science Based Medicine blog) to draw the association between acupuncture and “quackery.” “Acupuncture studies have shown that it makes no difference where you put the needles. Or whether you use needles or just pretend to use needles (as long as the subject believes you used them). Many acupuncture researchers are doing what I call Tooth Fairy science: measuring how much money is left under the pillow without bothering to ask if the Tooth Fairy is real.” Read More
Why do Medical Officials refuse to conduct a study comparing the vaccinated vs unvaccinated -- and the launch of Vaxxed 2 Dr Suzanne Humphries is a board certified and licensed internist and nephrologist. In 2011, she left her conventional medical career to study vaccination and practice integrative medicine. Since then, she has traveled and lectured all over Scandinavia, USA, Australia and New Zealand on the subjects of infant immunity, aluminum toxicity, vitamin C and vaccination. Suzanne received her MD from Temple University's medical school and the co-author of the very important book Dissolving Illusions, and more recently her autobiography Rising From the Dead. The new documentary Vaxxed 2 will be showing in Manhattan this weekend at an undisclosed location. If you wish to attend, visit the website Vaxxed2.com to sign up and you will receive notification for the location.
Whistleblowers being brought forth by the democrats in the Trump impeachment case John Kiriakou (Keer-ee-a-ko) is a former CIA analyst, counter-terrorism operations officer, case office and was a senior investigator for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He was later John Kerry's intelligence adviser. After 911, John was chief of counter-terrorist operations in Pakistan, later becoming the Executive Assistant to the CIA's Deputy Director of Operations. John turned whistleblower over the CIA's torture policy practiced against prisoners in custody, thus becoming the first government official to confirm the use of waterboarding on al-Qaeda inmates. He was tried for passing on classified information and served two years in a federal correctional facility. He was the sixth indicted whistleblower by Obama under the Espionage Act. Nevertheless, John had received 10 exceptional awards from the CIA and the State Department's Meritorious Honor Award. He has also received the Joe Callaway Award for Civic Courage as a national security whistleblower, the 2013 Peacemaker of the Year Award from the Justice Center, in 2016 the Sam Adams Award. among others. He has written several books, including "The Reluctant Spy: My Secret Life in the CIA's War on Terror," and more recently "Doing Time Like a Spy: How the CIA Taught Me to Survive and Thrive in Prison." John hosts the broadcast "Loud and Clear" which can be heard on the Progressive Radio Network every Wednesday at 7:00 Eastern time. His website is JohnKiriakou.com
Dangers of 5G roll out: The adverse effects of wireless EMF on the environment, plant and animal life and soil Dr. Beverly Rubik is an internationally renowned biophysicist investigating the role of consciousness in the physical world and complementary and alternative medicine, particularly the role of the human biofield. She is currently the founder of the Institute of Frontier Science, a nonprofit research laboratory in Emeryville California. Between 1988 and 1995, she was the Director of the Center for Frontier Sciences at Temple University and was a Congressionally appointed member of the National Institutes of Health advisory board for the Office of Alternative Medicine. Through her research the term "biofield" was accepted into the National Library of Medicine. Dr. Rubik serves on the editorial boards of the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine and the Journal of Vortex Science and technology. She holds a doctorate in biophysics from the University of California at Berkeley and is an adjunct faculty member of the California institute for Human Science, Saybrook University and the Energy Medicine University. Her present research is to investigate the effects of electromagnetic frequencies from wireless technology on human biology. Her websites are FrontierSciences. org and BRubik.com Dr Rubik will be speaking and giving a special presentation about the The Perils of Fifth Generation (5G) Wireless at the Union Theological Seminary Chapel next Monday, November 18, at 7:00 pm. The chapel is located at 3041 Broadway (between 121st and 122nd Street in Manhattan)
The Gary Null Show is here to inform you on the best news in health, healing, the environment. Research suggests risk of adverse effects to developing brains in association with fluoridated water consumption, Walnut consumption for two years associated with decreased loss of telomere length in humans, How meditation can help you make fewer mistakes, Apple phlorizin reduced plasma cholesterol in hamsters given atherogenic diet, Quitting Facebook could boost exam results, Lycopene, lutein supplements show skin protection from within against UV radiation, Diallyl trisulfide in garlic induces apoptosis in primary effusion lymphoma, Strong link found between level of depression and heart disease, stroke.
Gerald Celente is one of today’s pioneers in trend strategy and identifying the developments of change occurring in our nation and the world. He is the founder of the Trends Research Institute in Kingston NY and the publisher of the Trends Journal, which has been in publication since 1980. Gerald has since become highly sought after diagnostician and forecaster. He is also the host of the weekly show "Trends This Week," heard every Wednesday at 11 am Eastern Time on the Progressive Radio Network. More information can be found on the Institute's website TrendsResearch.com
The Gary Null Show is here to inform you on the best news in health, healing, the environment. Study: Broccoli Sprouts Rapidly Detox Pollutants. Being Overweight In Your 20s Can Take 10 Years Off Your Life. Cannabis Might Reverse Heart Failure, Study Finds, Trial finds soy isoflavones, vitamin D3 benefit women with irritable bowel syndrome, Study helps explain why exercise guards against heart disease, Gooseberry extract can reduce inflammation biomarkers, improve lipid profiles for those with metabolic syndrome, Vitamin D, calcium supplementation, exercise may be better for bones than osteoporosis drugs, Older adults find greater well-being in smaller social networks, study finds, Researchers discover coffee drinkers could halve their risk of liver cancer.
The Gary Null Show is here to inform you on the best news in health, healing, the environment. The Vaccine Deep State Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD Progressive Radio Network, November 7, 2019 Who coined the term anti-vaccine or anti-vaxx? The derogatory term "anti-vaxxer," which has been championed by the media and the medical industry's experts who function as the media's talking heads, are merely people who question the efficacy and safety of a heavy-loaded vaccination schedule for children. And this does not represent a small group of dissident individuals and parents. Rather it represents hundreds of thousands, or perhaps millions, of people in the US alone. We might consider mainstream news sources, such as the New York Times, once a highly respected newspaper, now becoming a propaganda vehicle for "manufacturing consent". In his book Public Opinion, political journalist Walter Lippmann, coined the expression "the manufacture of consent," which was later further elaborated upon by Noam Chomsky in his critically acclaimed book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media published in 1988. Chomsky defines the mass corporate media as "effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalized assumptions and self-censorship, and without overt coercion." Chomsky's insights remain every bit as relevant today for understanding the hidden motivations in today's media to promulgate the official medical establishment's vaccine doctrine and to demonize its opponents as they were over three decades ago for manufacturing consent to get Americans' support behind the Cold War. The media refuses to accept that those who have been vaccine damaged, or who have children who will suffer for the remainder of their lives from adverse vaccine events, have a legitimate right to speak their truth rather than being labeled as hysterical or crazy. All of these individuals and parents were pro-vaccine until they or their child became vaccine-injured. Similarly we saw the New York Times manufacturing consent for accepting falsehoods that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. And this was true across the mainstream outlets including the Washington Post, Fox, MSNBC, CNN and others. The Times fabricated that rationale to the public on behalf of the neo-cons in the Bush administration who were determined to have a war. None of the journalists publishing these lies have taken responsibility nor lost a night's sleep because their fakery led to the death of millions.